I enjoy collaborating with MA and PhD students and staff in order to help develop research projects. My specific areas of interest include:
I currently have over 20 postgraduate students, including six doctoral candidates, who are investigating a wide range of topics. You can read their abstracts below. They include the (mis)match between teachers? perceptions of learner?s difficulties and learners? perceptions of their own difficulties, the role of timing in focus-on-form, the use of DIY corpus building for independent learning, the role of computer games in EFL, classroom practices for teacher autonomy, and out-of-class learning. I sometimes take on new students, depending on my workload, the degree of overlap between the student?s research and my own, and the level of the student?s previous work. I supervise by using a wide range of online tools. I have limited time and can only take on students who meet a number of requirements, and whose research interests overlap with my own, and only with the permission of my institution. Feel free to contact me for more information.
Here is a reference from a former student, Junaiday Bte Januin, from Malaysia:
I found working with Hayo not only enjoyable but also very fruitful and academically stimulating. As an advocate of ?Learner Autonomy?, he really puts what he?s been writing into practice; he has coached me to be an autonomous learner myself to realise the fruits of learner autonomy. Hayo has always been generous with his knowledge and expertise; he has meticulously guided and facilitated me in preparing a sound PhD proposal. In brief, working with Hayo is an invaluable experience.
And here another one from a Thai student, Sorada, studying in New Zealand:
Thank you again for everything you have done for my proposal. Although we have talked to each other only for about 3 months, I feel that it is almost 3 years since I have learned a lot from you. Thank you for being supportive and always available when needed.
Sorada recently won the prize for best PhD thesis in Thailand ? huge congrats!
?The cure for boredom is curiosity. There is no cure for curiosity.? ? Dorothy Parker.
Below you can read about my students? research.
Kristin School?s tagline, ?Future Ready?, is used to promote the school. As the meaning of Future Ready (FR) hasn?t been explored, staff members currently have differing understandings of what FR means in theory and in practice. The aim of my action research project is to develop a collective understanding of the FR tagline amongst Kristin School staff. This will be carried out through a series of professional learning workshops involving a group of staff members. Researchers report that the world will experience major change in the next 20 years, driven by megatrends such as automation, artificial intelligence and exponential growth in computing power. Coupled with environmental challenges such as climate change, researchers report that the future world will be more volatile and uncertain than it currently is. As a result, the education sector needs to realign its focus to help prepare students to address these challenges. The workshops will introduce staff to research on future-focused education and futurist thought regarding predicted global changes that will occur over the next 20 years, and consider ways schools can prepare students to be ready for an unknown future. The workshop group will synthesise the research shared and use this to develop a common understanding of FR within a Kristin context. Changes in the workshop group?s individual and collective conceptual understanding will be measured using interviews and concept maps. The impact of participation in the workshop group will be measured using interviews. The workshop group will consider ways in which the wider staff can also be involved in the development of a collective understanding of FR and how the FR tagline can be operationalised within the school.
Change is an everyday feature of teaching. Much research has been conducted on the nature of change in the context of innovation and planned, or policy changes and the impact change has on pedagogy. It remains unclear, however, where teachers turn to in times of unplanned change. Specifically, it is unclear what role (if any) second language acquisition (SLA) research and language teacher pedagogy (Loewen, 2009; Borg, 2015; Sato & Loewen, 2019) has in such situations. Many studies related to a research/pedagogy link indicate that there is a gap between the two; that SLA research does not have much relevancy for language classroom pedagogy. However, these studies relied on a contextual continuity of the environment, the tools, and the students? and teachers? lives. This study asks language teachers where they turn to make pedagogical decisions in times of change, specifically in a time of crisis. Do teachers carry on with their usual methods of making pedagogical decisions? What role, if any, does research play in teachers? decision-making in times of crisis? To answer these questions, a survey of XXX teachers was conducted that asked them where they turned to for pedagogical decisions in times of crisis. To provide deeper insight into pedagogical decisions, interviews were conducted to illuminate the process by which teachers made their decisions in greater detail.
. In the field of language learning, learner autonomy has been a focus of research for some fifty years, and in particular there has been a proliferation of studies since the turn of the century (Benson, 2011). This increase in interest has included numerous studies in Japan (see, for example, Barfield & Nix, 2003; Mackenzie & McCafferty, 2002; Murphey & Jacobs, 2000; Nakata, 2009; Sakai & Takagi, 2009; Sakai et al., 2010; Smith, 2003; Tomita & Sano, 2016). However, the state of affairs in Japanese classrooms continues to present challenges and obstacles for language educators seeking to promote autonomy, including the backwash effects of Japan’s university entrance exam system , institutional resistance to change, and cultural and motivational factors (Brown, 2017; Kikuchi, 2009; Ryan, 2009; Sakai & Takagi, 2009; Smith, 2020; Yamamura et al., 2003). Adopting a mixed methods, action research/action case study design, the study explored ways in which learners themselves could contribute to the development of their own autonomy. The project was a collaborative student-led effort employing an intact class of 18 Japanese university students and held over a five week period as part of an elective course with a focus on educational issues. Data collected included a pre- and post- project questionnaire based on Sakai et al. (2010); observation notes; video recordings; individual written reflections collected post-project; and audio recordings of group discussions held post-project. The primary data analysis involved inductive qualitative coding, while the questionnaire was analyzed using descriptive statistics and paired-samples t-tests. During the project the students, choosing to work together as a class, negotiated and executed a plan of action. The narrative that emerged highlighted the importance of group dynamics to the process of collaborative autonomy development (Murphey & Jacobs, 2000), including the emergence of a leader figure, the formation of whole-group and sub-group identities, and peer modelling and scaffolding of autonomous behaviour. Student reactions to the project were largely positive, and there were indications that the project had positive effects in terms of promoting metacognition and learner motivation. This study contributes to the understanding of the potential for learner autonomy development in the Japanese context, and provides an example of one approach to exploiting the group-orientedness of Japanese learners to promote a collaborative, interdependent movement towards autonomy
In this thesis I document the process of change, by relating my change in classroom practice to Fullan?s (2016) work on change implementation. As I go through the three stages of implementation ? initiation, implementation and continuation, I highlight some of the barriers I and other educators faced with changing practice. I teach Science and Chemistry at a year 1 to year 13, single-sexed private school in Auckland. In my school students often hide their failures rather than embrace them, making it hard for teachers to help students progress their understanding. So I decided that something needed to change and so I started with implementing personalised learning plans with each student in one class, to see if I could help my students overcome their fears of failure and be successful in my subject. As a result I found that there are many barriers to educators changing their pedagogy starting with themselves as they have to confront their own beliefs and equally the students beliefs about what makes a ?good teacher?. I compared my journey with that of other educators who have altered their teaching practice and found that there are many parallels and that the hardest part is to continue with a change, given our lack of time in this modern age.
The purpose of this project is to increase the knowledge and awareness of digital citizenship, but ultimately to change the behaviour of the staff, students and parents at Kristin Junior School. This will be done by implementing a digital citizenship curriculum framework across the school through integrating the framework into the existing units of work being taught in the school.
The Common Sense Media tutorial has been conducted with all staff. This will be followed up with team teaching and lesson observations in three pilot classes, to evaluate the effectiveness of the Common Sense Media curriculum scope and sequence as a resource that can be used in New Zealand schools, as they relate to teacher competency (one possible resource to lift staff knowledge and awareness). Each of these classes will have four hours of time dedicated to them as a combination of observation and team teaching. The purpose of this is to take practical steps to evaluate the programme being implemented.
If it works, the teachers in the school will be better informed about digital citizenship and will know how to teach it. The different facets that make up digital citizenship will be clear to them. The Digital Citizenship lessons will be integrated into the school curriculum (and units of work the teachers deliver). Student awareness of digital citizenship will have increased, they will be equipped with skills they may need in the future. The drawbacks and opportunities associated with including this resource as part of the school curriculum will be clearly identified.
The interest in promoting autonomous learners in the field of education has been growing for the last three decades. Teacher autonomy is now recognized as one of the major factors that affects the development of learner autonomy, especially in language learning (Little, 1995; McGrath, 2000; Thavenius, 1999). We know that teachers who perceive themselves as autonomous are likely to exercise their own autonomy in their teaching (Jiang & Ma, 2012); however, how they go about this and how it affect their learners are not well-known. This study aims to investigate: 1) the extent to which teachers perceive themselves to be autonomous teachers operationalised as a) fostering learner autonomy, b) teachers participating in ongoing professional development, and c) having freedom in their own teaching, 2) how they foster learner autonomy in practice, 3) how they exercise their freedom in practice, and 4) the extent to which the learner consider that the teacher is fostering their learner autonomy. The study closely examined the teaching and practice of four English teachers at a Thai university who self-identified (through a questionnaire) as highly autonomous. The study included detailed observations of their classes over a period of 10 weeks in undergraduate English courses that have the development of learner autonomy as one of their key goals. The observations were complemented with interviews before and during the observation period. After the observations and teacher interviews were completed, learners studying in each classroom observed were participated in focus group interviews to discuss how they perceive learner autonomy fostered by their teachers. The results of this study can draw a number of pedagogical implications that can be used as to inform teacher training courses, teachers? professional development as well as their teaching and classroom practice.
Population growth and sector evolution in education globally and in New Zealand have meant a sustained period of rapid change and development has been underway for quite some time. New schools in New Zealand are currently being constructed at a rapid rate, and existing schools are spending a lot of time and energy on re-thinking educational practices and approaches to learning. Many of the structural and pedagogical changes that the country has seen recently have arguably been mandated particularly to meet the principles of Innovative Learning Environments (ILEs) in the organisational, learning, and relational elements of school planning. These developments afford those involved at each school the opportunity to implement new research and education initiatives in their local communities. However, the ways each school and community go about these processes seem to vary greatly and research on the processes new schools and their stakeholders undertake in order to make the school operational is limited. This study addresses this gap by offering a case study of the implementation planning processes of one school. This research focuses on describing the drivers and processes involved in creating the implementation plan for one school. The thesis offers recommendations for other practitioners undertaking similar work in school development, a theoretical argument for approaching ILE organisational practices from an ecological systems thinking perspective, and implications for further case study research by both new schools and schools transitioning to ILE-aligned pedagogies and systems along with their stakeholders and communities. Finally, the research will highlight opportunities for further investigations into the operationalisation of ILEs in New Zealand.
There has been a lot of attention given to MOOCS and their potential to disrupt education in recent years. Language education, albeit being a rather slow starter, is starting to embrace this development. There is a growing interest in language MOOCs and they appear to be multiplying at a rapid pace (Gee, 2012). However, what MOOCs in general and LMOOCs in particular have struggled with is encouraging and enabling student interaction in order to improve learning. Such a lack of interaction is even more crucial for language MOOCs as the role of interaction has been considered important in in second language acquisition (Gass & Mackey, 2006; Long, 2006). In addition, the high heterogeneity among students (language level, learning needs, goals, intentions and learning styles) is also an important issue in LMOOCs. People come to MOOCs for different purposes and goals. However, most existing LMOOCs still fail to incorporate these elements into their design. Kay et al. (2013) even point out that the existing MOOCs and LMOOCs are not half way through in implementing personalisation. This PhD project aims to solve the existing problems by designing a language MOOC with a newly coined term, Social and Personal Online Language Course (SPOLC). The design principle of SPOLC aims to provide a personalised language learning environment by exploiting the data available through learning analytics as well as the highly interactional learning activities for participants. The content of the project targets primarily, albeit nor exclusively, professional engineers who need to give presentation in their workplace. The course is entitled Presentation@work and will be launched around May-June 2018, so feel free to drop me an email if you want to participate or help evaluate the course design.
This study presents the results of an action research project that had the aim of solving a local problem of how to implement active learning in English CALL courses in the researcher? tertiary institution near Tokyo, Japan. The study focused on two of the researcher?s compulsory first-year CALL classes in the fall semester of 2019. This was done according to the researcher?s own interpretation of active learning. Active learning was operationalized as consisting of six constructs - engagement, interactivity and cooperativeness, learner-centeredness, learner autonomy, deep learning, and generic skills. There were a total of forty-six participants (learners), 9 male and 37 female. Data collection methods included semi-structured interviews with a full-time faculty member (as a representative of the faculty) and also fourteen learners from the course, two focus group meetings with fellow native-English-speaking teaching staff, a series of classroom observations, questionnaires, audio recordings of learner-learner interactions, learner self-reports, a teaching log/journal, and review of learner materials. The results of the study indicate that there were a number of factors that were not taken into consideration during course planning that may have impeded successful implementation, a number of changes were required as the course progressed, and going through the process resulted in some positive change. The theoretical and pedagogical implications of the study are discussed.
Emotions and emotion regulation are well researched in mainstream psychology. Although the study of emotions is currently receiving increased attention in the literature on second language learning, little empirical evidence is available on the emotional effect of feedback on language learning. This study investigates the emotions experienced by adult ESL learners enrolled in an English for Academic Purposes (EAP) program at an American community college, in response to feedback on their performance inside and outside of the classroom. It also investigates how these learners regulated their emotions. Data gathering involved a survey of 25 participants and in-depth interviews with five of these, utilizing dynamic systems theory (DST). The findings indicate that the learners experienced a wide variety of positive and negative emotions. Outside the classroom, however, the interviews showed that the learners encountered mostly negative feedback accompanied by negative emotions. The interviews revealed the intricate ways in which the learners were able to successfully respond through a four-phase emotion regulation process. In contrast to most past research in SLA, negative emotions were found to have a facilitative role in language learning. The findings of this study give insight into the challenges learners face and point to possible ways for teachers to better support them.
In academic settings students experience a wide range of emotions. These emotions?both positive and negative?have found to have significant effects on students? performance and achievement. Thus, it is crucial for second/foreign language (L2) learners to be equipped with strategies to successfully self-regulate their learning at both cognitive and affective levels. The aim of the proposed study is twofold. First is to investigate how Thai students? emotions experienced in L2 learning relate to causal antecedents (appraisal of control and value over learning and outcomes) and effects (motivation) outlined in the control-value theory of achievement emotions. Second is to design and implement a strategy training program intended to equip students with skills to successfully self-regulate their learning through affective dimensions. The efficacy of the program will be evaluated based on its effects on students? emotions, appraisals (i.e., perceived control and value of learning), goal orientation (intrinsic or instrumental motivation), and motivated behaviours, which will be investigated through mixed methods. The findings of this study are expected to make both theoretical contributions, in that they help to understand the nature of learners? affective responses and their impact on learning, as well as pedagogical contributions, in that they can help both teachers and learners to identify the most appropriate combination of learning strategies to ensure optimal learning outcomes.
This research will investigate if teacher autonomy is transferring to and resulting in learner autonomy at the University of California, Davis in their Workload 57 program. The study format will be a case study that will follow three Workload 57 teachers over the span of one quarter. Each teacher will be interviewed three times: pre-quarter, half-way through the quarter and at the end of the quarter. The initial interview will establish the teacher?s beliefs about their own autonomy and their practices, as well as their beliefs about learner autonomy, and how they currently are promoting learner autonomy in their classrooms. Three classroom observations will be conducted along the same time span. The observations are to see whether their beliefs in their own autonomy and their beliefs in learner autonomy are transpiring and being represented in their teaching, their assignments, and in the materials that they are using in their classrooms. Information from the interviews, and observations will be analyzed as well as materials used by all three teachers including: course syllabi, assignment sheets, and materials used by each teacher throughout the quarter. The goal of the study is to learn about teacher?s beliefs in their own autonomy and to see if their beliefs are being represented in their teaching, and to find out whether teacher training is needed to improve the level of autonomy currently present in the Workload program.
Research in study abroad has developed over the past several decades, with an increasing focus on individual learners and their experiences (Isabelli-Garc?a, Bown, Plews, & Dewey, 2018). Despite this trend, it remains unclear what affordances beyond the classroom are available to students and whether and how learners enact their agency to make use of the available opportunities. Some studies have attempted to investigate the resources available in the study abroad context but research has mostly been limited to the use of retrospective techniques and identifying language learning activities analytically, without attempting to gain holistic insight into the full range of learner experiences (e.g., Freed, Segalowitz, & Dewey, 2004; Tanaka, 2007; Hern?ndez, 2010). In contrast, the present study adopts an ecological framework to examine how four Japanese learners enacted their agency to capitalize on affordances for language learning beyond the classroom during study abroad. Following Mercer (2011, 2012) and Larsen-Freeman (2019), agency is understood as a multidimensional construct, with both internal and external dimensions. Learners utilized a smartphone application to regularly report their language use and associated reflections. Further details about their experiences were elicited by post-study abroad questionnaires and interviews. The findings demonstrate the different ways that learners enacted their agency to capitalize on a variety of affordances for learning English. They also show how these experiences impacted them as learners. By viewing agency as a multidimensional construct, the interconnectedness of learners? actions, thoughts and feelings is revealed. A close examination of these relationships will enhance our understanding of how learners act on affordances for language learning during study abroad and how to assist them in their efforts.
Robert Cavanaugh (USA) – doctoral dissertation 'Language Teachers’ Self-Regulation of Pedagogical Sources of Stress'.
Sachiko Nakamura (Japan) – doctoral dissertation 'The antidotes to boredom: a classroom-based study on strategy instruction to enhance boredom regulation for L2 learning'.
Victor Stone (Canada) – Master's project 'Examining Turn Taking Between High-Intermediate Speakers of English in a Conversation Discourse'.
Naoko Nakao (Japan) – Master's thesis 'This is the end! A case study of a Japanese learner's experience and regulation of anxiety'.
Deborah Hay (New Zealand) – Master's thesis 'The practice of changing pedagogy: One teacher?s experience in implementing portfolios'.
Nathan Calvert (New Zealand) – Master's thesis 'Future Ready: Developing a collective understanding of a school tagline'.
Kat Liu-Asumoa (New Zealand) – Master's thesis 'Disruptive Evolution: A Case Study of how One School Develops its Innovative Learning Environment'.
Vatsana Vongsila (Laos) – Master's thesis 'Willingness to Communicate in an ESL classroom.'
Jim Luders (New Zealand) – Master's thesis 'engagement of Maori students.'
Lou Reddy (New Zealand) – Master's thesis 'Persuasion via Gamification: Mobile Applications for Supporting Positive Behaviour for Learning (PB4L) Pedagogy.'
Winifred Chukwurah (New Zealand) - Master's thesis 'experiences, symptoms and management related to chronic fatigue syndrome: a small study.'
Reshmin lata (New Zealand) - Master's thesis 'Enhancing professional Learning: Identifying obstacles and solutions to the successful development of pedagogical skills for teachers in an online distance school'.
Tim Shawcross (New Zealand) – Master's thesis 'Online communities of practice in the secondary music classroom: A tool for increased collaboration and peer to peer learning?'
Tina Swann (New Zealand) - Master's thesis 'Whakatipu iwi nui: Growing great people. An evaluation of Māra Kai and Service-Learning as a culturally responsive approach to teaching in an English-medium mainstream.' school in Aotearoa New Zealand'
Monique Ngatoro (New Zealand) - Master's thesis 'the value of a school base digital learinig framework: does it offer the support and guidance needed for teachers of varying digital capabilities?'
Margo Thorpe (New Zealand) - Master's thesis key competencies leading teaching and learning - imagining new possibilities in education.'
Sarah-Jane Khor (New Zealand) - Master's thesis ‘Exploring teachers’ perceptions on the use of digital devices and the digital technologies curriculum content in diverse decile 1 schools.’
Katrina Hampton (New Zealand) - Master's thesis ‘exploring play for learning in a sole charge school through action research.’
Anne Passmore (New Zealand)- Master's thesis ‘Multi-level language teaching in a New Zealand secondary school - A practitioner research study’.
Laraine Heaslip (New Zealand)- Master's thesis 'Stories of resilience: supporting youngwomen to thrive at secondary school'.
Jan Garbutt (New Zealand)- Master's thesis 'The landscape of teaching multi-age classes in a New Zealand secondary school'.
Philippa Mallinson (New Zealand) - Master's thesis 'How can knowledge building communities be developed in New Zealand secondary schools?'
Toni-Maree Westcott (New Zealand) - Master's thesis 'Factors that influence the efficacy of Professional Development in Digital Technologies for New Zealand Primary School Teachers'
Hurimoana Nui Dennis (New Zealand) - Master's thesis 'Aue te Mamae: Exploring Te Puea Memorial Marae?s ?Te Manaaki Tangata Programme?, as an indigenous response to homelessness in Tamaki Makaurau'
Pratika Singh (New Zealand) - Master's thesis 'Early Childhood Teachers? Perspectives of Inclusive Education in New Zealand?.
Sally Ratchford (New Zealand) - Master's thesis 'Investigating drama as a teaching and learning pedagogy?.
Gareth Haddon (New Zealand) - Master's thesis '?Metacognition in a Secondary School: The Development of a Collaborative and Iterative Professional Development Programme?.
Hayo Reinders was the Principal Supervisor for my Masters thesis, which was completed in 2018. Hayo was an exceptional supervisor, whose timely feedback, guidance and questioning skills helped me immensely along my journey. Hayo regularly challenged my thinking which ensured that my thesis had a much greater depth than I'd anticipated. I highly recommend Hayo, and was grateful to have had the chance to complete my Thesis with his guidance. Nathan Calvert, Auckland, New Zealand